page-taxonomy.tpl.php

Issues

Coalition letter: Lisa Jackson - EPA tailoring rule on biogenic carbon (Jun. 18. 2010)

NASF joined a coalition of 163 organizations signing on to a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson urging the agency to correct the final Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (Tailoring Rule), which would treat greenhouse gas emissions from the combustion of biomass the same as such emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels.
4:40 pm June 18, 2010 | | RSS 2.0 |
June 18, 2010

Climate

National climate change policies can improve the contribution of the forest sector in reducing greenhouse gas levels and make an impact in the near term by capitalizing on the potential of forests and wood to sequester carbon and increase the production of renewable energy. State forestry agencies have a significant stake in the outcomes of these decisions as they directly manage and protect millions of acres of state forests and assist private landowners in the management of nearly two-thirds of U.S. forestland.

4:04 pm February 8, 2010 | | RSS 2.0 |
February 8, 2010

Coalition Letter: Kerry/Graham/Lieberman - recommendations for climate policy issues important to U.S. forests (Dec. 9, 2009)

The Forest Climate Working group writes to offer perspectives on three climate policy issues of particular importance to U.S. forests: carbon offset markets, supplmental incentives for domestic reductions outside of offset markets, and forest adaptation.
6:21 pm December 9, 2009 | | RSS 2.0 |
December 9, 2009

Coalition Letter: Peterson/Lucas/Rahall/Doc Hastings - adaptation funding on state and private forest lands (June 23, 2009)

Climate change threatens the nation's 750 million acres of forests-the same forests that provide clean air and water, carbon sequestration, renewable energy and numerous other ecosystem services at little cost to the public. Changes in precipitation, temperature, fire patterns, increased CO2 concentrations, pest outbreaks and other influences associated with climate change have the potential to transform forest ecosystems by altering their composition and shifting their distribution.1 In some cases, forest migration rates may not match the rate at which the climate is changing leaving open the possibility of losing important forest types and forest biodiversity.
June 10, 2009

NASF joins 41 organizations in pushing for forestry offsets

On May 18, NASF signed on with more than forty organizations to a joint letter to U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce and Subcommittee on Energy and Environment leadership urging the inclusion of forestry offsets in the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Waxman-Markey). This is part of NASF's ongoing work with the Forest Climate Working Group coalition to ensure recognition of forestry in practical and effective federal climate change legislation.
12:43 pm May 20, 2009 | | RSS 2.0 |
May 20, 2009

Coalition Letter: Waxman/Barton/Markey/Upton - domestic offsets program (May 18, 2009)

Our organizations greatly appreciate your efforts to consider climate change legislation, including the meaningful adjustments that you have made in the new draft legislation. We write today to explain why we believe that a robust domestic offsets program must be a central element of any such policy, and why further adjustments to the draft legislation would help achieve this end.
12:19 pm May 18, 2009 | | RSS 2.0 |
May 18, 2009

Coalition Letter: Waxman/Barton/Markey/Upton - American Clean Energy and Security Act (May 18, 2009)

We write today to explain why we believe that a robust domestic offsets program must be a central element of any such policy, and why further adjustments to the draft legislation would help achieve this end. To avoid excessive administrative complexity and cost, the emissions cap in any cap-and-trade program can only cover large sources of emissions. Within the uncapped sectors of the U.S. economy, however, there are cost-effective opportunities to reduce, destroy, avoid, and sequester greenhouse gas emissions. These opportunities can take the form of offset projects. We urge you to ensure that federal climate legislation takes full advantage of the tangible benefits offsets can offer for farmers, ranchers, forest landowners, American consumers, local ecosystems, and the global climate.
May 18, 2009

Landownership questions loom in advance of international climate talks

A new report from the International Institute for Environment and Development addresses questions about who decides and owns forest resources in the debate among reduced deforestation stakeholders in countries with tropical rainforests. The possible inclusion of "reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation," or REDD, projects in a post-2012 global climate change framework could mean exploitation of local communities by governments or powerful private-sector stakeholders if land tenure has not been formally established, according the the report's authors.
2:22 pm May 12, 2009 | | RSS 2.0 |
May 12, 2009

Four Actions to Support Sustainable Forests: Presidential Transition White Paper (November 2008)

White HouseThe National Association of State Foresters is committed to helping this administration provide the forestry leadership needed for our country.  Our recommended actions reflect the most pressing challenges facing our nation's forests and should be incorporated into an integrated approach to ensure healthy and sustainable forests for us and for future generations.
December 1, 2008

Forest Markets

forest marketsParticipation in efforts that maintain and diversify markets for forest products is a commitment of the National Association of State Foresters. With this in mind, NASF charged its Forest Markets Committee to develop recommendations on what the association should do to pursue this direction.
12:15 pm October 24, 2008 | | RSS 2.0 |
October 24, 2008